OK - he is writing out of his expertise. But for those who worship physicists no matter what they say, and who think science has SOLVED or will solve all problems, this is worthwhile. World's Smartest Physicist Thinks Science Can't Crack Consciousness String theorist Edward Witten says consciousness “will remain a mystery” By John Horgan on August 18, 2016 I’ve been writing a lot lately about consciousness, the ultimate enigma. I used to think why there is something rather than nothing is the ultimate enigma. But without mind, there might as well be nothing. Some mind-ponderers, notably philosopher Colin McGinn, argue that consciousness is unsolvable. Philosopher Owen Flanagan calls these pessimists “mysterians,” after the 60’s-era rock group “Question Mark and the Mysterians.” Recently, physicist Edward Witten came out as a mysterian. Witten is regarded with awe by his fellow physicists, some of whom have compared him to Einstein and Newton. He is largely responsible for the popularity of string theory over the past several decades. String theory holds that all of nature's forces stem from infinitesimal particles wriggling in a hyperspace consisting of many extra dimensions. Witten is optimistic about science’s power to solve mysteries, such as why there is something rather than nothing. In a 2014 Q&A with me he said: “The modern scientific endeavor has been going on for hundreds of years by now, and we've gotten way farther than our predecessors probably imagined.” He also reaffirmed his belief that string theory will turn out to be “right.” But in a fascinating video interview with journalist Wim Kayzer, Witten is pessimistic about the prospects for a scientific explanation of consciousness. The chemist Ash Jogalekar, who blogs as “The Curious Wavefunction,” wrote about Witten’s speech and transcribed the relevant section. (Thanks, Ash.) Here is an excerpt: I think consciousness will remain a mystery. Yes, that's what I tend to believe. I tend to think that the workings of the conscious brain will be elucidated to a large extent. Biologists and perhaps physicists will understand much better how the brain works. But why something that we call consciousness goes with those workings, I think that will remain mysterious. I have a much easier time imagining how we understand the Big Bang than I have imagining how we can understand consciousness... .

Born gay, transgender lacks science evidence washingtontimes.com Contrary to Lady Gaga’s lyrics, a report finds scarce scientific evidence to conclude that gay and transgender people are “born that way.” The 143-page paper, published this week in The New Atlantis journal, combs through hundreds of studies in search of a causal, biological explanation for sexual orientation and gender identity, but comes up empty. “The belief that sexual orientation is an innate, biologically fixed human property — that people are ‘born that way’ — is not supported by scientific evidence,” says the report, written by a psychiatrist and a biostatistician at Johns Hopkins University. “Likewise, the belief that gender identity is an innate, fixed human property independent of biological sex — so that a person might be a ‘man trapped in a woman’s body’ or a ‘woman trapped in a man’s body’ — is not supported by scientific evidence,” the report states. The study’s authors, Drs. Lawrence S. Mayer and Paul R. McHugh, also point to evidence indicating those traits are more fluid than conventional wisdom suggests. However, the authors stress that the lack of scientific evidence does not mean sexual orientation and gender identity are choices. Rather, additional research is needed to determine to what extent biology and environment shape sexual orientation and gender identity, and to what degree such properties are fluid, they say. “I’m not suggesting the statement [that gay and transgender people are ‘born that way’] is false,” Dr. Mayer, a biostatistician and epidemiologist, told The Washington Times. “I’m saying there isn’t enough scientific evidence to support the statement.” The authors also say there is scarce evidence to suggest that sex reassignment medically benefits patients — one reason that Dr. McHugh, in his capacity as psychiatrist in chief at Johns Hopkins Hospital, ended the practice in the 1970s. Sarah McBride, national press secretary for the Human Rights Campaign, said The New Atlantis report is another instance in which Dr. McHugh espouses “his own personal prejudice against LGBTQ people.” “His latest essay runs contrary to the overwhelming consensus of the medical community and would crumble if held up to any scrutiny, which is probably why he chose a publication that is not a peer-reviewed scientific journal,” Ms. McBride said. “Despite McHugh’s obsession with attacking LGBTQ people, neither he nor his co-author have ever published an actual research article on gender or sexuality in a scientific journal.” The report cites several studies by J. Michael Bailey, a professor of psychology at Northwestern University who has studied the concordance rate of sexual orientation in twins extensively. In a 1991 study published in the Archives of General Psychiatry, Mr. Bailey showed that identical twins (who are genetically the same) are more likely to both be gay than fraternal twins (who are genetically different) or adoptive siblings (who are genetically unrelated). Mr. Bailey replicated those results in a 2000 study using the Australian National Health and Medical http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/24/born-gay-transgender-lacks-science-evidence/ Page 2 of 2 Aug 26, 2016 08:03:09AM MDT Mr. Bailey replicated those results in a 2000 study using the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Twin Registry, finding higher concordance rates with regard to sexual orientation among identical than fraternal twins. “I would say they’re probably the strongest evidence that there’s some biological basis,” Dr. Mayer said. “If you look at the — what [Mr. Bailey] calls the level of concordance between the pairs, he gets very high rates. That is probably the strongest evidence, the twin studies.” Yet even those studies fail to show to what extent sexual orientation is a biological phenomenon rather than a product of one’s environment, Dr. Mayer said. Mr. Bailey said he agrees and disagrees with various aspects of the Mayer-McHugh report. He said the notion of fluid sexuality is plausible for women, but pointed to his own research demonstrating that sexuality is more fixed in men. Additionally, he agreed that the “idea of innate, fixed gender identity is not consistent with empirical evidence” but said sex reassignment may still be the best option for some people. Despite his disagreements with the report, Mr. Bailey praised the authors for their willingness to discuss a controversial topic that he said deserves more scrutiny from the scientific community. “Most importantly, I agree that all of these issues should be openly discussed and researched,” Mr. Bailey said. “There is little government support for open-minded investigation for these controversial issues. That is unfortunate and exactly backwards. Support should be directed to resolve the most contentious issues.” Copyright © 2016 The Washington Times, LLC. C

Born gay, transgender lacks science evidence washingtontimes.com Contrary to Lady Gaga’s lyrics, a report finds scarce scientific evidence to conclude that gay and transgender people are “born that way.” The 143-page paper, published this week in The New Atlantis journal, combs through hundreds of studies in search of a causal, biological explanation for sexual orientation and gender identity, but comes up empty. “The belief that sexual orientation is an innate, biologically fixed human property — that people are ‘born that way’ — is not supported by scientific evidence,” says the report, written by a psychiatrist and a biostatistician at Johns Hopkins University. “Likewise, the belief that gender identity is an innate, fixed human property independent of biological sex — so that a person might be a ‘man trapped in a woman’s body’ or a ‘woman trapped in a man’s body’ — is not supported by scientific evidence,” the report states. The study’s authors, Drs. Lawrence S. Mayer and Paul R. McHugh, also point to evidence indicating those traits are more fluid than conventional wisdom suggests. However, the authors stress that the lack of scientific evidence does not mean sexual orientation and gender identity are choices. Rather, additional research is needed to determine to what extent biology and environment shape sexual orientation and gender identity, and to what degree such properties are fluid, they say. “I’m not suggesting the statement [that gay and transgender people are ‘born that way’] is false,” Dr. Mayer, a biostatistician and epidemiologist, told The Washington Times. “I’m saying there isn’t enough scientific evidence to support the statement.” The authors also say there is scarce evidence to suggest that sex reassignment medically benefits patients — one reason that Dr. McHugh, in his capacity as psychiatrist in chief at Johns Hopkins Hospital, ended the practice in the 1970s. Sarah McBride, national press secretary for the Human Rights Campaign, said The New Atlantis report is another instance in which Dr. McHugh espouses “his own personal prejudice against LGBTQ people.” “His latest essay runs contrary to the overwhelming consensus of the medical community and would crumble if held up to any scrutiny, which is probably why he chose a publication that is not a peer-reviewed scientific journal,” Ms. McBride said. “Despite McHugh’s obsession with attacking LGBTQ people, neither he nor his co-author have ever published an actual research article on gender or sexuality in a scientific journal.” The report cites several studies by J. Michael Bailey, a professor of psychology at Northwestern University who has studied the concordance rate of sexual orientation in twins extensively. In a 1991 study published in the Archives of General Psychiatry, Mr. Bailey showed that identical twins (who are genetically the same) are more likely to both be gay than fraternal twins (who are genetically different) or adoptive siblings (who are genetically unrelated). Mr. Bailey replicated those results in a 2000 study using the Australian National Health and Medical http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/24/born-gay-transgender-lacks-science-evidence/ Page 2 of 2 Aug 26, 2016 08:03:09AM MDT Mr. Bailey replicated those results in a 2000 study using the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Twin Registry, finding higher concordance rates with regard to sexual orientation among identical than fraternal twins. “I would say they’re probably the strongest evidence that there’s some biological basis,” Dr. Mayer said. “If you look at the — what [Mr. Bailey] calls the level of concordance between the pairs, he gets very high rates. That is probably the strongest evidence, the twin studies.” Yet even those studies fail to show to what extent sexual orientation is a biological phenomenon rather than a product of one’s environment, Dr. Mayer said. Mr. Bailey said he agrees and disagrees with various aspects of the Mayer-McHugh report. He said the notion of fluid sexuality is plausible for women, but pointed to his own research demonstrating that sexuality is more fixed in men. Additionally, he agreed that the “idea of innate, fixed gender identity is not consistent with empirical evidence” but said sex reassignment may still be the best option for some people. Despite his disagreements with the report, Mr. Bailey praised the authors for their willingness to discuss a controversial topic that he said deserves more scrutiny from the scientific community. “Most importantly, I agree that all of these issues should be openly discussed and researched,” Mr. Bailey said. “There is little government support for open-minded investigation for these controversial issues. That is unfortunate and exactly backwards. Support should be directed to resolve the most contentious issues.” Copyright © 2016 The Washington Times, LLC. C

SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH You, or someone you know, grew up in an observant family and schools, and now has doubts, and describes himself [meant to include both genders] as honestly searching for the truth. Ask yourself [or him] these questions: Is science vs. Torah one of your problems? Then have you read: Genesis and Genes by Yoram Bogacz Torah, Chazal and Science by Moshe Meiselman Genesis and the Big Bang by Gerald Schroeder [even though I do not agree with this book - have you/he read it?] In the Beginning by Nathan Aviezer [even though I do not agree with this book - have you/he read it?] There is a God by Antony Flew Signature in the Cell by Stephen Meyer God's Undertaker: Has Science Buried God? by John Lennox The Devil's Delusion: Atheism and its Scientific Pretensions by David Berlinski some of them? one of them? none of them? If the last, you are not honestly searching for the truth. Is evidence for the truth of the Torah your problem? Then have you read: Permission to Believe and Permission to Receive by Lawrence Kelemen [even though I do not agree everything in these books - have you/he read them?] Living Up to the Truth http://www.dovidgottlieb.com/publications.htm by Dovid Gottlieb The Informed Soul by Dovid Gottlieb Beyond a Reasonable Doubt by Shmuel Waldman [even though I do not agree with this book - have you/he read it?] some of them? one of them? none of them? If the last, you are not honestly searching for the truth. Is your problem contradictions or other logical faults in Jewish sources? then have you read: The Way of God by Luzzatto [this edition: https://www.amazon.com/Elucidated-Derech-Hashem-Rabbi-Naiman/dp/1598269127/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1470314677&sr=1-1&keywords=abba+zvi+Naiman] The Kuzari by Yehudah Halevi [this deition: https://www.amazon.com/Kuzari-Defense-Despised-Classics-Library/dp/1598269615/ref=pd_sim_14_7?ie=UTF8&dpID=51zObpYLsCL&dpSrc=sims&preST=_AC_UL160_SR106%2C160_&psc=1&refRID=75MY6EEGTCEE1WHCNQK9] Horeb by Samson Raphael Hirsch The Nineteen Letters by Samson Raphael Hirsch Strive for Truth by Rav Dessler The Informed Soul by Dovid Gottlieb Emuna by Dovid Sapirman some of them? one of them? none of them? If the last, you are not honestly searching for the truth. Is your problem the reliability or coherence of the Oral Tradition? then have you read: Strive for Truth by Rav Dessler The Oral Law by Harry Schimmel The Dynamics of Dispute 2ed. by Zvi Lampel Maimonides' Introduction to the Talmud by Zvi Lampel some of them? one of them? none of them? If the last, you are not honestly searching for the truth. Is your problem philosophical issues like free will? then have you read: Strive for Truth by Rav Dessler Masterplan by Aryeh Carmell Halachic Man, and The Halachic Mind by Josehph Soloveitchik Living Inspired by Akiva Tatz Will, Freedom and Destiny by Akiva Tatz Letters to a Buddhist Jew by Akiva Tatz Worldmask by Akiva Tatz some of them? one of them? none of them? If the last, you are not honestly searching for the truth. ...........to be continued...........